A Kit Up Inside Look at "Goat Lab"

This is a heavily controversial topic. The article you are about to read was written by a former Navy SEAL medic (it's shared with his permission) who was trained by the Army's course at Ft. Bragg, NC.  In the SEALs, we called it the 18 Delta course, but as Jack would tell you, it's called something else. Enjoy what Wired Magazine's Danger Room left out and let us know what you think.

-Brandon

When Killing Animals Saves Lives

The gunfight in the background has been muted as far as he's concerned, He's only committed to saving the life of his teammate right now. He can feel the warm spit hit his face in the darkness as someone yells "Ten mikes to extract!" He slowly nods his head and feels for a pulse. He gets a steady thump (pause), thump (pause), thump; not quite as fast and weak as it was in the beginning; his friend has stabilized for now,

Another life saved, he thinks to himself.

The medic tries to push out the thoughts and images of so many friends lost last deployment to IEDs, He sharpens his mind's eye and feels a sense of relief and accomplishment knowing he has saved another life.

Suddenly, the bright lights come on! He looks down to see his friend lying on the floor, only he's looking at a gun shot goat. Welcome to Goat Lab.

The word is out that the US Military engages in 'live tissue training'. For those of you out there that think we're revealing some classified material here, just spend a little time around the internet and you'll find that Fox has reported on it as well as Stars and Stripes, the LA Times, and many other news sources. If the super sleuths at PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) can figure it out, it can't be that hard.

"We have the best trained and most prepared combat medics in the world."

Former students at 18 Delta Special Forces Combat Medical School might reference it as 'Goat Lab', but let's not forget the brave goats, pigs and cats (they simulate infants) that have also sacrificed their lives so that others may live. The practice of using animals as training aids for combat medics and forward operators (among others) has spurred intense controversy and legislation that is pending on the further ability to use animals as 'patients'.

I'm an animal lover, I always have been. When I was asked as a little kid what I wanted to be when I grew up, the answer was always the same: a veterinarian. All animals, too, even cats (for all you cat haters out there). I always appreciated how cats, even after being separated from their mother at birth, still have a natural instinct to hunt and kill. I like animals more than most people, really, and would much rather hunt people than some rare sheep high in the mountains of a former Soviet republic. It's more sporting. People can shoot back.

But when it comes to using animals to help train our Combat Medics, soldiers, and forward operators, I'm all for it. (For the record, I'm not bashing hunting... I love me some venison, elk, pheasant.....)

There is currently a Bill before Congress, H.R. 1417, the Best Practices Act, sponsored by Southern California's very own Rep. Bob Filner, which, in summary is trying to amend Title 10, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Defense to use "only human-based methods for training members of the Armed Forces in the treatment of severe combat injuries". (As I understand it, it is still sitting with the House Armed Services Committee.)

The Bill suggests that it is an "imperative" to replace live tissue training and calls the use of live tissue training "outdated and inferior" relative to simulators and moulage training, Excuse my French, but this is utter bullsh*t.

"until you've cut through living tissue on a creature whose life is depending on your timely and successful procedure to survive, you've never really done it"

The reason the 18 Delta medics and now other SOF units have been using this method before and throughout the GWOT is because it works. We have the best trained and most prepared combat medics in the world, and they have and will continue to save lives because of the use of caprines and other animals in training.

The reason that this works is multifold, You can simulate performing a surgical crycothyrotomy on a mannequin a dozen times, but until you've cut through living tissue on a creature whose life is depending on your timely and successful procedure to survive, you've never really done it. Being able to tent the skin in the dark, slick with real blood, with smoke and explosions all around you, and get the tactile sensation of your scalpel through real flesh, the whoosh of air when you punch through the crycothyroid membrane and secure your endotracheal tube and Ambu Bag (if needed) isn't something you can use a dummy to simulate, and moulage just doesn't quite cut it either.

I realize that there are some very high tech (and very expensive) simulators on the market and being prepared to be brought online with the US Mil, but in my opinion, and until proven otherwise, will still be found wanting. Additionally, it tests the operator. 18 Delta is still part of the Q Course for aspiring Green Berets, and to put someone under pressure in a realistic combat training scenario with their 'patient' spurting blood from an arterial wound tests the mettle of that individual,

It's all well and good to work through a moulage or simulator scenario and come away covered in fake blood, but the real thing changes your perspective, When you are attempting to stop an arterial bleed and every second you can feel and see the heart pumping out the lifeblood of a living creature, your heart rate rises, and despite the fact that you are working on an animal, you find yourself caring.

Kit Up wants to know what you think?

-Brandon